Stewart Bint Author
  • Home
  • About
  • News
  • Anthologies
  • Non-Fiction
  • Stewart Bint's Blog
  • Store
  • Contact

Going Barefoot - the Facts and the Myths

12/31/2017

1 Comment

 
​My guest blogger today is Ben Donnelly, a London based musician – saxophonist, bassoonist and composer arranger. He also has a background in maths, science and some languages (French and Italian) which he teaches privately alongside his music work (and Hindi which he is teaching himself).

He hasn’t worn shoes for years, and in fact no longer keeps any at home. 

Playing with a number of London jazz ensembles, big bands, and function bands, Ben is on the verge or releasing his second album of original songs with this own band Platonic Curry. When he’s not working he can often be seen at football stadia around the country supporting QPR, or in one of his local cinemas. He lives in Acton with his girlfriend Carolina.

Here he looks at some of the undisputable scientific facts as to why going barefoot is good for us - and debunks some of the myths which have been dressed up as science.  
I’ve been going barefoot for many years now. I started doing it properly, in that I made the decision not to care about how it would affect other people’s opinions of me, about 15 years ago not long after I’d left home for the first time and came to the realisation that it was part of my identity and I needed to own it, not hide it away as a guilty secret.

From then I made the gradual progression to the point where I am now where I no longer keep any footwear at home.

​In fact my mother recently informed me she has given away all of the socks that were still technically mine, at her house to a refugee charity and in doing so she did a huge favour to me as well cementing my status as someone who really doesn’t need or want to wear anything on my feet, anywhere, ever. 

But it’s only been in the last 5-6 years when I started engaging with other barefooters on social media, instead of just the older and less popular society for barefoot living which has been around since before I first started using the internet back in the late 90s. 

Picture

​And it’s only on social media that I’ve seen the recurrence of this strange, scientifically nonsensical, yet somehow irrepressible claim known as Earthing or Grounding. Now I can understand why people are attracted to it. When I think back to the start of my acceptance and ownership of bare feet as part of who I am, I remember first having to decide what I was going to say to people. How am I going to justify it? It’s so uncommon for people not to want to wear shoes that I’d better have a really good reason. So I can understand why some people while going through this themself might be delighted to hear about grounding. A scientific sounding idea that seems to make a scientific case for going barefoot. Just what they’re looking for, surely. They can answer all the questions asked to them with confidence that science is on their side!
 
Well I have good news and bad news for them, and for you. The good news is that science IS on your side. Going barefoot is very good for you and there is a strong scientific case to be made in favour of not wearing shoes. The bad news is that that scientific case is definitely not grounding/earthing, which as I shall explain, is nonsense and is just a case of scientific sounding terminology strung together in a nonsensical way to sound authoritative to unfamiliar ears, but embarrassingly ignorant to anyone who remembers their school science lessons.
 
So let’s remind ourselves of some of the claims made by advocates of grounding/earthing. Not everyone argues for all of the claims, nor does everyone limit to themselves only to the claims that don’t contradict each other. That should be a warning sign from the start! But here are a few:

  • When we wear shoes we insulate ourselves electrically from the earth, cutting us off from any potential benefits of the flow of charged particles in or out of our bodies. 
  • When we build up too much static charge from friction of day to day activity it is harmful to us and therefore it is important to go barefoot in order to discharge it regularly. 
  • The body generates lots of dangerous free radicals which do harm to us. These can be dismissed from our bodies through our feet into the earth as an electrical discharge. 
  • We can also draw electrons up out of the earth into our bodies and gain extra energy just by virtue of going barefoot.​ 
So I’d like to briefly address each of those claims and then give you the real reason why going barefoot is good for you.
 
First of all, while it is true that shoes do insulate our feet electrically, our feet are not the only means of contact we have with the ground. We touch objects with are hands and brush past things with our bodies regularly throughout the day. Door handles, furniture, pets, other people. Even when we sleep on a bed at night we are relatively well earthed.
 
To the second claim I listed above I would say that the amount of insulation from shoes alone, can easily be overcome by levels of electrical charge much lower than would be expected, or dangerous to remain in the body at any one time. If you have that much charge in you that you should be worried about it, it will discharge through your shoes, or some other easier route to ground, for the same reason that if you touch a badly maintained electrical appliance you are likely to get an electric shock even with shoes on.
 
Thirdly, when grounding advocates make claims about free radicals, they are counting on people listening to them not to know what a free radical is. They’ll gamble on you thinking it has something to do with radioactivity, assuming it to be dangerously toxic. A free radical is simply an ion or ionic compound not attached to any molecular structure but chemically loose (as well as electrically loose) and carrying a charge. It will behave like any other charged particle, except it has a lot more mass because it contains one or more atomic nucleus which is orders of magnitude heavier than an electron. It’s unlikely to flow through a layer of skin because it is so much bigger than an electron and may find a molecule to attach to, or else simply continue existing not doing very much, similar to the dissolved potassium and sodium ions in the mineral water (or tap water for that matter) that you drink.
 
And lastly, the silliest claim of all:
 
Electrons do not flow out of the earth. That's not how negatively charged particles behave. Electric charge flows into the earth. It's why electronic appliances are earthed for safety so that excess current has a route to ground where it is attracted that doesn't involve travelling through anyone's body. Grounding claims consistently misuse scientific terms to pretend that the nonsense is scientific.
 
But as I said there is a scientific explanation of why going barefoot is good for you, why it feels good and why it makes you happier but it has nothing whatsoever to do with charged particles, conductivity, electrons or anything flowing between the earth and the body in either direction.

There are basically three components to it. One: Efficiency of movement. Two: temperature control. Three: psychological boost/sensory information.
 
1) When you walk barefoot you allow the individual bones and muscles in each foot (26 bones if I remember correctly) to do their specific jobs that lead to the most energy efficient and least phsyically stressful way of walking. It doesn't just benefit your feet but your knees, hips and backs as every part of your body has a role to play and has to take some of the stress of the impact and of carrying your body weight. Your feet can allow you to efficiently transfer your kinetic energy (not a woo term - it just means the energy of your motion) from one step to the next making you feel light and agile. You don't lose energy from the cushioning of shoes and therefore don't have to push off with each step again - you just bounce along while your arches in your feet act as springs to store energy and release it as you step.

2) A lot of your body heat escapes through your feet and like your hands, your feet are really good temperature sensors. Going barefoot and directly gauging the temperature of the ground beneath you allows your body to regulate its temperature based on how much heat you're losing to your environment, or in hot weather allows excess heat to escape through your feet - something that just can't happen very well if your soles are covered (even a pair of flipflops inhibits this).

Picture
3) Being aware of what you're walking on makes you feel better. Literally. The brain loves sensory information. It gives you a positive response when it has more awareness of the nature of your environment. For the same reason that images look better in colour and sounds sound better when they have reverb added to them to give you a more detailed impression of whereabouts you are, when your feet are feeding back to you about what you're standing on your brain responds positively to reinforce your habit of providing more information. If you wear shoes and starve your brain of this information you're not going to feel as happy as if you were barefoot. Your sensory information also helps with your motion of course because knowing what you're walking on is always good for balance and being able to know if you're somewhere safe or unsafe.

So that's basically it. Nothing overly technical. Nothing hiding in a load of badly used scientific terms. And nothing that contradicts every scientific experiment ever performed. It should be very easy for anyone to understand

On the other hand, Earthing/Grounding is a failed hypothesis. The evidence that proves it false was discovered by other scientists hundreds of years before anyone ever thought of it and no new evidence has been brought forth to support it today (and if anyone did, manage to, they would also have to explain how computers and other electronic devices can possibly work, because the claims made by grounding advocates directly contradict the way they work.)
 
In simple terms, the fact that I'm writing this on one device and you're reading it on another continent is proof that Grounding doesn't work.
 
But it’s worse than that, because grounding doesn’t even explain the benefits of going barefoot that are exclusive to going barefoot. You could wear copper soled shoes all day and be just as well earthed as if you were barefoot all day. You could also go barefoot all day but spend the whole day on a thickly insulated floor up in a tall building. You’re can feel benefits of going barefoot without being earthed. But if you’re earthed and not barefoot, which is equally possible, you get very little benefit because by not being barefoot you’re eliminating all of the benefits I described above. This is another aspect of why the grounding hypothesis is so unscientific. It attributes the benefits of going barefoot to Earthing without making any attempt to show that being barefoot is not the cause of such benefits.
 
Going barefoot is great. It's healthy, it's fun, it's actually the best option for almost everyone on the planet. We don't need nonsense like to support that. The truth is enough. Now I have heard people often ask another question that deserves a proper answer: Even if it’s nonsense, if it encourages more people to go barefoot, isn’t that a good thing anyway?
 
Well, there are two big problems here. First of all, let’s consider the way in which it encourages people to go barefoot. It doesn’t do very much to people who are much happier keeping their shoes on. Even if they believe it, they will find other ways to earth themselves on a regular basis. Lots of people love wearing shoes. A lot. And they hate going barefoot. It’s just not for them and no-one’s going to change their minds, sad to say. If they believe that they need to earth themselves they will find other ways to do it. So apart from them, that leaves the people who want to go barefoot, and probably are going barefoot already but are just looking for ways to answer the questions they get asked so they can justify their choice to friends, family and complete strangers. In this case, it seems that may the grounding idea, even though false, has something to offer them. Except unfortunately, it’s a false friend that will betray them in an instant. They may mentioning grounding the first few times they’re asked why they go barefoot and feel more and more confident about it. They’ll forget the reasons why they wanted to go barefoot in the first place – the simple ones such as “I like how it feels”, or “It helps me keep my balance”, or “Shoes make my feet uncomfortable”, and so forth. And instead they’ll go on bamboozling the untrained listener with fascinating scientific sounding terminology. And then one day they’ll be in a conversation with someone who was particularly good and attentive in their school science lessons, or may even have a physics degree. And then they’ll hit a very hard, painful and unforgiving wall. Because whatever they say about grounding will be challenged, much in the same way that I’ve challenged it here. And then what are they left with? They have claimed that that was their best reason to go barefoot, and now it turns out to be rubbish. They now have no reason to go barefoot and ought to put their shoes back on, at least when out and about where other people can see and judge them. And they end up worse than when they started because they have replaced the uncertainty of “what will people think?” with the experience of “wow, I have been talking nonsense all this time and I got found out! Going barefoot is a really bad idea”.
 
The second big problem is the impact it has on the reputation of the general practice of going barefoot. Anyone like me seen wandering around barefoot is immediately put into that catergory ahead of any other, in the same way that people get categorised by race or religion – the most obvious thing that someone notices about you gives you your label and you are judged alongside everyone else of the same label. So if barefooters get known for being advocates of pseudoscience, who choose not to wear shoes for no reason better than drawing physics-defying electrons out of the earth through their feet, then it hurts all of us. This has already begun to happen. Look up the various anti-pseudoscience pages on facebook and you’ll see among all the memes making fun of all different kinds of mind boggling credulity, are memes about the belief of grounding. There you’ll see how ridiculous it is in the eyes of the scientifically literate. And they do not (sadly uncharacteristically unscientific of them) make the distinction between barefooter and earthing advocate, because until someone like me goes in and tries to explain that we’re not all like that, they’ll have never encountered anyone who doesn’t fall into both categories.
 
I’d just like to leave you with this thought: When you made that decision to go barefoot in places where most people wear shoes, what was your main reason? It doesn’t have to be a fancy technical one. It doesn’t have to be a reason that applies to lots of people. It doesn’t even have to be that interesting. It only needs to be true for you, to the point that you know that you will be better off and happier barefoot all the time and can explain it to anyone interested enough to ask. THAT is why you are a barefooter. Not grounding, nor any of the other reasons I’ve given that might apply to me, or indeed to many people but not necessarily to you. Your reasons, as long as they make sense are all you need. Once you know them well enough to be honest with yourself, then rattling them off to other people is child’s play. From then on you can answer any other questions that arise just as easily and it gets even easier as you get more experienced. “Doesn’t it hurt?” Well once you’ve been doing it for a few months you know the answer to that. “What about in winter?” Once you’ve been through a whole winter you’ll know the answer to that too. And don’t be afraid to say “I haven’t done a winter yet, I’ll let you know in March (or October if you live in the Southern hemisphere)!” “I prefer it” is good enough if you don’t want to say anything more. Just whatever you say, own it and say it confidently as if it should be obvious. Eventually you won’t even have to say anything as your confidence will be evident in you walk and facial expression.

 
1 Comment

The Trial Of Santa Claus

12/20/2017

0 Comments

 
The prosecution witness was very firm when Santa Claus went on trial for cruelty to children.

“He’s completely wrecked the spirit of Christmas,” she said. “Instead of bringing joy and happiness to those poor little souls, all he does is bring misery and heartache.

“The wonder and awe in children’s eyes when they open the presents he brings, soon disappears when they see what their friends have got. It fosters discontent and jealousy.  And when I ask what Christmas actually means to them they say ‘Presents.’ ‘Lots of chocolate.’ ‘It’s about some geezer who died and we remember the day he died.’ ‘Dad gets drunk and Mum cries.’ ‘It means I get a new computer. The one Santa brought me last year isn’t as good as Robin’s, so I want a better one.’

She concluded: “It’s time Santa was jailed for such cruelty, and Christmas scrapped.”

Santa was equally forceful in his own defence: “I agree that the spirit of Christmas – its true meaning – is being lost. But you can’t blame me for that.

“I’m afraid Mankind’s progress through time has become tarnished. The further he goes and the more he gets, the more he wants. Whatever happened to families going to church on Christmas morning, and it was a time for rejoicing because our Saviour had come to Earth on that day two thousand years before?
​
“If it’s ever possible for Him to come again, the time is now, for Mankind has strayed from the path He showed them. They’ve let grasp and greed cloud their lives and they’ve lost sight of the true road ahead. Most children grow up with no appreciation of values – either material values, or more importantly, spiritual values.

“But remember this: the spirit of Christmas is still there for those who choose to seek it. If you find me not guilty, Christmas will continue to come to the world every year, despite the self-destructive path Mankind is taking. But, if I’m found guilty, can the world itself survive if we no longer celebrate the birth of its saviour? I put it to you, that it cannot.
​
“The world is what people have made it. And people are what the world has made them.”   
0 Comments

The Liebster Award, and Mystery Blogger Award

12/20/2017

0 Comments

 
Picture
I've been nominated for two blogging awards -- The Liebster Award, and The Mystery Blogger Award. 

As what I need to do for them both is very similar, I'm going to cheat and combine everything into one. Oh, and I'm afraid I'm going to be a bit Scrooge-like and not nominate anyone myself. This is because when I've asked bloggers to participate in events like this before, not many are willing to take part. Their reticence does surprise me, because the aim of these activities is to promote and gain publicity for their blogs. But, ce la vie!

If this disqualifies me from being considered for the awards, then so be it. But I'll still enter into the spirit of them both by giving the facts asked about me, and answering the questions.

Let's do a little bit of housekeeping first: twitter.com/Seetheuniverse_ nominated me for the Mystery Blogger Award, and here's her excellent blog: www.seetheuniverse.co.uk/ The award was created by Okoto Enigma ( www.okotoenigmasblog.com/ ) who wanted to give some well-deserved recognition to bloggers for creating amazing content.

And I was nominated for the Liebster Award by  twitter.com/ShadowsDay. Here's their blog:  thesunwillsetforyou.blogspot.co.uk/.


Both the Liebster Award and Mystery Blogger Awards call for me to give a few facts about myself. So here are ten:

1. I'm a full-time writer, encompassing PR, a magazine column, and four published novels
2. I watched the very first episode of Doctor Who in 1963...and haven't missed an episode since
3. Having suffered a severe mental health crisis in 1997, I was sectioned for 28 days under the UK Mental Health Act
4. I normally go barefoot, only wearing shoes when it's absolutely necessary
5. I have an extremely charismatic budgie called Alfie, who features regularly on my Twitter account
6. My acclaimed 7,300 word horror/fantasy novella, The Twitter Bully, was written after trolls turned on me for supporting victims of online abuse
7. I'm married to Sue, and we have two grown-up children, Christopher and Charlotte
8. I was named on the 2016 list of "Inspirational Mental Health Advocates that are changing the world" 
9. My wife and I are cruise addicts. We have two lined up for next year, and have already booked one for 2019
10. From the age of 20 to 30 I worked as a radio broadcaster...newsreader, current affairs presenter, and 'phone-in show host.
 
Picture
Picture
Some of the questions from each nomination were the same, too. So here's a combination:
1. Since when did you start blogging / What made you decide to take up blogging?
My website came with a built-in blog. It was something I'd never done before, so decided to give it a go, initially to promote my books. My first post was in May 2015, and tells of the somewhat drastic research I did for that novella I mentioned earlier, The Twitter Bully. Here it is:
 stewartbintauthor.weebly.com/stewart-bints-blog/handcuffed-in-a-tiny-cell-suffering-for-my-art 

2. What do you feel about blogging? 
It's a perfect platform for any writer to express their opinion,  or promote themselves and their products. My original intention was to use mine simply to promote my books. But then I saw how I could lend my name as an author to promoting good causes, charities, and supporting other writers. So my blog now covers any subject, and is open to anyone who would like to write a guest post.

3. Who would you like to work with in the future?  
Anyone and everyone ( twitter.com/ShadowsDay asked if I'd be willing to work specifically with them as well. Of course).

4. Are there any tips you can give to new bloggers? 
Content is crucial. Don't simply write something for the sake of it. Make it entertaining or informative...preferably both.

5.Will you still continue blogging years from now / What are your plans 10 years from now?
I'd like to think I'll still be writing and blogging, but I will be almost 72 in 10 years time. I don't have any plans to retire, because I love what I do so much.

6. Who or what is your inspiration in writing?
I mentioned earlier that I've never missed an episode of the world's longest-running science fiction series, Doctor Who. Not only are the stories charged with emotions, heartbreak, action and adventure - the very essence of a good yarn - but it was the original series back in 1963 that inspired me to start writing when I was seven. I became enraptured by the storylines which could take place at any time in Earth';s history and future, and anywhere in the universe and beyond. I started creating my own worlds and my own characters, writing my stories in little blue notebooks until my parents bought me a portable typewriter for my ninth birthday.

And those make-believe worlds became invaluable after my Dad died when I was 11. I retreated more and more into those places where I was in control of my characters' fate - knowing that  whatever happened to them during the story, I'd always make sure they were okay in the end. My worlds were certainly better than the real one at that time. 

7. If someone offered you a large sum of money to give up your blog, would you do it?
Yes, I would. But on one condition; that someone takes it over and keeps it going for guest bloggers. I'd like to think that it could continue to support charities, good causes and other writers, without me.

8. If you could have any celebrity round for tea, who would it be and why?
 It would be my Twitter friend Talia Dean twitter.com/taliadean 

( www.taliadean.com/ )
Talia is a great singer who was a contestant on X Factor this year. But as well as loving her voice, I admire her for her determination to help children and children's charities.

9. You are stranded on a desert island, with only enough phone battery to make a single phone call...who do you call or help and why?  
John Tracy, of International Rescue, on the Thunderbird 5 satellite. It would be a great thrill to ride in whichever Thunderbird they sent to rescue me, 1, 2 or 4.  I'm loving the rebooted CGI TV series of Thunderbirds Are Go, but I still remember the original puppet series back in the 1960s. It was an essential part of my childhood.  

10. You have won the lottery! What is the first thing you do with your winnings?
A large donation to the Dorothy Goodman School
twitter.com/DGSAcademy   ( www.dorothygoodman.co.uk/ ), which, incidentally, Talia Dean is also interested in.  And I'd restart West Leicestershire Mind. The picture of me with one of their organisers, above, was taken shortly before the Government's austerity cuts forced it to close two years ago. I was working with them at the time, on a major awareness raising event.  

0 Comments

Christmas Tag

12/9/2017

0 Comments

 
Thank you to Aimee Jones (Twitter: twitter.com/Seetheuniverse_) for tagging me in the Christmas Tag. You can find Aimee's blog here: / www.seetheuniverse.co.uk/
What Are The Rules Of This Tag?
Picture
Give credit to the person who tagged you

Include a link to their blog

Answer the 10 questions that are provided

Add three bonus questions that only the people that you tag, should answer

Tag 10+ people
​
And most importantly...have fun!
The 10 questions for everyone....
1.  What is your favourite thing coming into the festive period?
The feeling of friendship, family and belonging, when the decorations go up; and Susie B and I getting ready for the open house at Bint Towers - our doors are thrown open to all family and friends to drop it any time.

2. What is your favourite Christmas themed drink?
Snowball (Advocaat with lemonade and lime juice).  And Ginger Wine.

3. Do you have any Christmas or Winter traditions?
Christmas - our open house for all friends and family. We always have a houseful for around seven days, and it's lovely.
Winter - I do try to gt a barefoot hike in at some point.

4. Christmas jumpers - yay or nay?
Well, I do have a couple. But they're not garish..very tasteful, in blue and grey!

5. What are your favourite Christmas songs?
Silent Night, Fairy Tale of New York, A Winter's Tale, Never Do A Tango With An Eskimo.

6. If you could star in any Christmas movie, what would it be, and why?
White Christmas. It has to be the most iconic Christmas movie of all time, and is certainly the first one I remember watching as a young child.

7. If you could kiss any celebrity underneath the mistletoe this year, who would it be?
My first celebrity crush was Olivia Newton John - I had a poster of her on my bedroom wall as a teenager. And she's still stunning today.

8. Do you have a favourite Christmas scent (such as candles, fragrances...)?
Mulled wine. When I smell that, it really is Christmas.

9. What is your favourite festive food?
Duck. We always have a duck with the turkey, and I only have one small slice of Turkey, preferring to focus on the duck!

10. What is the one extremely extravagant gift that you would love, but are unlikely to receive?
 A bottle of Balvenie single malt whisky. But at $37,000 a bottle, I'll be happy with a Glenmorangie instead.
Bonus questions just for me to answer
What is the best dessert to have after a Christmas dinner?
Oh, I'm going to be traditional here - Christmas pud with oodles of brandy cream.

Have you ever had a midnight kiss on New Year?
In my romantic days many years ago, yes. And if Susie B's still up on New Year's Eve, we still do indulge! But we have been married nearly 36 years!

Do you still visit Santa on the run up to Christmas?
We always used to take our children, Chris and Charlotte, to see Santa. But now they're grown up and flown the nest, no. When grandchildren come along I shall look forward to taking them to Santa, and to seeing if Santa remembers me - in particular, if he remembers bringing me the most wonderful wind-up toy train was I was six.
​
Bonus questions for the people I have tagged
Which Christmas programme best describes you, and why - Queen's Speech, Doctor Who, or Call The Midwife?

Given the choice, what weather would you like while having your Christmas dinner - English snow and frosts, or Australian sun? 

​What's your most embarrassing Christmas moment?


Looking forward to seeing everyone'd answers!   And Merry Christmas!!!!!
0 Comments
    Stewart Bint supports mental health charity Lamp Advocacy.

    Click here to donate
    Picture

    Author

    Stewart Bint is a novelist, magazine columnist and PR writer. 

    He lives with his wife, Sue, in Leicestershire in the UK, and has two children, Christopher and Charlotte, and a budgie called Bertie.

    Usually goes barefoot.

    Archives

    August 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    September 2021
    August 2021
    June 2021
    April 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    September 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    September 2019
    July 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.